DEEPER CHANGE

NEW RELEASE - From the "Deeper" series: Discover the one to spiritual formation and lasting changhe

Paperback 

or Kindle

Say yes to Students of Jesus in your inbox:

 

SEARCH THIS SITE:

Archive
Navigation
« Jesus: My Favorite Old Testament Priest | Main | Follow the Loser »

Monday's Meditation: With a god like that, who needs a devil?

Some images go beyond metaphor. They are deep-down truth. We can meditate on deep-down truth each day of our lives; such truth will never run dry because we are in touch with the fabric of creation, the heart of God. Perhaps today we could muse on the revelation that, as followers of Jesus, God is our Father.

He’s not like a father. He is our Father. It’s how the universe works: the transcendent creator of the universe, the One who spun the galaxies off his fingertips while wisdom danced with delight, is our Father. And Jesus, the Son, came to reveal the Father so that we might see him and grow in the family likeness. Consider this simple statement from the Perfect Son:
Which of you, if your son asks for bread, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him!” (Matthew 7: 9-11)
These words of Jesus are vital to our everyday walk with God.
Many believers have no trouble with the idea that God is great and powerful. We have been told all our lives of the power of God. We have not been told enough of his role as Father. If we see the greatness of God without recognizing his Father’s heart, we will find ourselves at a distance from him. Because of his greatness and majesty, God is capable of working all things after the counsel of his will. The thoughts and plans of humanity cannot overcome the purpose of God. Yet apart from understanding the nature of his fatherhood, we are tempted to see every event in our lives as the work of the all-powerful God. A few examples:
  • My cancer is a gift from God,” says a daughter of God. “Through this ordeal I have discovered his tender care and the love of my family.”

  • I wouldn’t trade that auto accident for anything,” says a son of God. “Even though I am paralyzed I realize it was God’s will to humble me.”

  • When my spouse left me I was devastated,” says a child of God. “Now I see it was God’s plan all along.

To be sure, the Father is at work in each of these settings, bringing grace and hope to the lives of each one touched by the sin and sorrow of this world: but are we really willing to say that our Heavenly Father is the author of such things? With a god like that, who needs a devil? What earthly parent would bestow sickness, accident or betrayal upon their children? 
Like any loving parent, our Heavenly Father is present through times of trial and sorrow which are inevitable in a sinful and ailing world. Unlike an earthly parent the Heavenly Father has the wisdom and power to redeem the loss, repair the hurt, and bring a greater good beyond the tragedy.
So many of us are convinced of God’s power. Are we equally convinced of his goodness? I’d like to suggest this week we should meditate on the staggering revelation of Father.

Reader Comments (9)

It's bfosh from twitter. I want my students to absolutely know that God is working in and through all things for His glory and their ultimate joy. Ultimate is obviously the key word there. If cancer brings me closer to Christ and increases my opportunity for greater joy, then we DO have a loving father who does allow tragedy and pain to draw us closer to himself. I think in some instances you can say he authored it, and in others you have to say that He allowed it. (Job). regardless of what you chalk it up to, in some way yoh must say that He was involved. He does all this and simultaneously keeps His righteousness and "fatherness" in tact.

August 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterBritc17

Welcome! I think you raise important points, with a balance tilting toward God's goodness.

Without a doubt we live in a fallen world, which finds itself at the core in rebellion against the Creator. Sin was set loose in the world through the disobedience of Adam. Even nature finds itself awaiting the revelation of the sons of God. For me, this means sickness may come simply because our world is broken.

We agree, too, that God's sovereignty and glory is highlighted by his ability and eagerness to bring greater good out of pain, suffering, and even outright sinfulness. It causes me to praise Him and love him more.

Sadly, in my experience many (most?) North American Christians embrace nearly every event in life as God's ultimate will, and attribute the origins to Him. This strikes me as a simplistic view of His Creation and intent for his handiwork. Perhaps you've heard people say, "Everything happens for a reason," the idea being God is the cause. This is very different from saying, "God brings reason out of everything that happens."

Finally, I wonder where the greater revelation lies: the Book of Job or the words of Jesus? For many believers, Job seems to be the default position on suffering, even though Jesus is God's final word, and "the exact representation of God nature." (Hebrews 1). Jesus never blessed a storm, and ruined every funeral he attended.

You're always welcome here, britc17--thanks for commenting!

August 15, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterrayhollenbach

great post today. i've always thought it was completely ridiculous how quickly people ascribe really awful things to God. like, what, was God in on the Rape of Nan King, the Killing Fields of Cambodia, the Mai Lei Massacre, The Jonestown Suicides, Rwandan genocide, Trench Warfare, the Holocaust, the Trail of Tears, the Irish Potato Famine, The London Fire of 1666, and Bernie Madoff? Isn't the Lord's prayer in general and asking for God's will to be done on earth (like it already is in heaven), by definition, shorthand for admitting that not everything that happens down here is God's will?

buuut, i do think the practice probably often comes from seekers trying to make sense and finding meaning in their suffering. in other words, it's theologically troublesome and ultimately, i think, defeating, but i can see how it could come from a place of hurt. if someone (to use your example) can rationalize their paralysis as God's will, i think it can often help them overcome the chaotic futility that they must feel. If God somehow was the author, then he must have a plan for them beyond the paralysis. and maybe it helps keep them from asking questions like 'why didn't God intervene?"

Obviously, the best pastoral answer is: of course God didn't cause your paralysis, but he most definitely has a plan to 'bless you and not to harm you.'

August 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterAnonymous

I think your key insight comes from the Lord's Prayer, where we are instructed to ask for his will to be done "on earth as it is in Heaven." You are spot-on when you indicate this means, "not everything that happens down here is God's will." That's why I observed that we've heard so much about God's power, but the net effect is to make him distant and uncaring--unless we (as you say) try to make sense of things. This leads to some pretty tortured rationale about God's mysterious ways being beyond our understanding.

Instead, Jesus invites us to think (and act) in concrete terms: God is a loving and capable Father, standing with us through a sin-sick world. We can relate to that, I think, with great comfort.

Please comment any time!

August 15, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterrayhollenbach

I think your key insight comes from the Lord's Prayer, where we are instructed to ask for his will to be done "on earth as it is in Heaven." You are spot-on when you indicate this means, "not everything that happens down here is God's will." That's why I observed that we've heard so much about God's power, but the net effect is to make him distant and uncaring--unless we (as you say) try to make sense of things. This leads to some pretty tortured rationale about God's mysterious ways being beyond our understanding.

Instead, Jesus invites us to think (and act) in concrete terms: God is a loving and capable Father, standing with us through a sin-sick world. We can relate to that, I think, with great comfort.

Please comment any time!

August 15, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterrayhollenbach

I think your key insight comes from the Lord's Prayer, where we are instructed to ask for his will to be done "on earth as it is in Heaven." You are spot-on when you indicate this means, "not everything that happens down here is God's will." That's why I observed that we've heard so much about God's power, but the net effect is to make him distant and uncaring--unless we (as you say) try to make sense of things. This leads to some pretty tortured rationale about God's mysterious ways being beyond our understanding.

Instead, Jesus invites us to think (and act) in concrete terms: God is a loving and capable Father, standing with us through a sin-sick world. We can relate to that, I think, with great comfort.

Please comment any time!

August 15, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterrayhollenbach

This is fantastic, Ray!

August 16, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterCaleb Wilde

I'm not sure I want to say the book of Job is somehow less relevant than Jesus's words. Indirectly they are His words and the word is the final authority and Jesus just fulfills it, but that's not the point. If we can only use Jesus's words, then let's look at John 9. The man was born blind for a reason. He was born blind so the work and glory of God could be displayed. Sin didn't cause this the scriptures say. So do SOME things happen for a reason?

I think if we're not careful we make God's intent and centeredness to be man orientated. His love and concern and care is ultimately about us. This is humanistic deism which is ultimately just humanism. No doubt, He absolutely loves us. He's absolutely gracious. He's absolutely merciful and forgiving and I could go on and on. But His ultimate and chief aim is absolutely the glory and fame of His name. So He saves us and heals us not because of us but for the sake and glory of His name. I think this makes suffering a little easier to swallow and understand.

When I was a child I loved my parents. I was fortunate to have had both of them in my life. I loved them when times were good and I loved them when times were bad, but I was desperate for them when I was hurt or sad. I wanted to crawl in their lap and for them to hold me. Now if you and I can agree that He (Jesus) is what is ultimately good, and if we can agree that He is what will ultimately bring us joy then we can not be upset when God allows suffering in our lives. Now a normal parent wouldn't cause their child to suffer just for their child to come close, but we're not dealing with normal children in this case. We're dealing with a Romans 1 type people who would rather worship the creation instead of the creator. I do not desire suffering, but if suffering will push me to arms of my creator then I will praise Him for what James calls the perfecting of my faith.

I know my writing comes from a reformed context, and I understand and respect other views, but I just don't see how you can rationally separate God from these things. God the Father killed Jesus.(Isaiah 53) That's 1st degree murder in the states. It was premeditated. It was a sin for the Romans to kill Jesus. It was a sin for Judas to betray Jesus. It was suffering for Jesus to hang on the cross, but it was all a part of the plan. As revelations says "the lamb slain before the foundations of the world". The death of Jesus was a part of God's unique plan from the beginning.

I don't believe this somehow magically makes suffering easy, but I do believe it offers a biblical perspective on the purpose and intent of our God. His intent for His children is ultimately good, because His intent for us is Him.

August 18, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterBrit Channing Foshee

HI Brit: Yep. I hear you. And I understand that my post is difficult to swallow from a reform point of view. I genuinely appreciate the dialogue, and respect your presuppositions, even when we differ!

I'm totally OK with God "allows" suffering. I draw the line at Him being the author of them. Like you, I have a concern for his glory (even as you posit his goodness). Like you, I see the dangers of a man-centered ethic or theology. Yet there are points where we diverge:

Our Lord's death on the cross was the result of loving cooperation between the eternal Father, Son, and Spirit: it was in their hearts (as one) from before the beginning began. If anything can be called unique in all history, it's the atonement.

John 9 indeed highlights God's glory through the goodness shown in the healing. Nowhere do I read in the text (or subtext) that the Father is the agent of the birth-defect: only that He worked everything toward his glory. (Granted, *my* presuppositions come into play there.)

Finally, I'm personally acquainted with parents who have experienced infant deaths. Not once have they been consoled by the idea that it was God's plan all along. One couple had a crisis in faith over this very issue. All of them, however experienced God's care, goodness, and greatness as he helped them restore their lives to a new kind of normal.

Don't worry! I won't always push these theological buttons! Check out today's (8/18) post for something completely different!

Peace and blessings!

August 18, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterrayhollenbach

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>